A Bigfoot habituator in Florida

Kevin Thomas Kehl and others were in the Panhandle of Florida doing work on a "paranormal documentary." They were using professional cameras and not the home versions that most YouTubers' have (that explains the pro quality of the video). They came across a man who owns over 3,000 acres of land who has had a long term habituation with a small sasquatch. This has been going on for years and he has many tales of interaction with the Bigfoot.
I have always been skeptical of such stories but this guys sounds real and he had no reason to lie, unless he thought he was going to be on TV. I can usually tell when people are lying and this just seems to recount it very well.
He even says the Bigfoot eats dog food and fruit. It keeps its distance most of the time and observes "Williams" family from a distance. It even looks after his son when he waits for the school bus.
This is a very rural area of Florida (the same state where the Enoch habituation happened). There is tremendous cover and vegetation up there. With food and water this animal could stay hidden for a very long time. The only reason they see it is because it must want to be seen.

Please go to Kevin's YouTube site and subscribe. You will like what you see.

MABRC, Team Quantra, and Melissa Hovey

DW Lee of MABRC seems to be benefiting from the team Quantra speculation on a captured Bigfoot. His time to shine and all that. He is also doing a little chest beating to annoy Matt Moneymaker. He clearly is loving his moment.

Arrogance in big game hunting will get you killed, I assure you. Precision of mind is paramont.

I have no inside information on the O-6 Bigfoot capture claimed by Ed Smith. But I'm a little confused. What does Melissa Hovey have to do with this?

Finding Bigfoot evolution

When Animal Planet began running Finding Bigfoot, they never revealed that witnesses may indeed be Bigfoot researchers. Now they do.

In season one there was a couple Bill and Carolyn Bridges of Northern Florida. They claimed a Sasquatch was visiting the home and leaving smudge prints on a glass door. The team measured them and concludes its Bigfoot. Did you know black bears are common in northern Florida?

Did you know the Bridges are regulars ay BFRO events?  The producers of the show did not want you to know that. It would seem to inside.

The show now (last night in the Sierra episode) makes it known if a witness is a Bigfoot researcher. That is good information and its honest.

Ketchum DNA study - many will fall

The photo below is from a Bigfoot researcer in Tennessee who is being worked by the Ketchum study. He is not alone.Why do researchers do this?

Its because they have a vested interest and visions of fame. That makes them part of the hoax. There is no other way around it.

They won't be able to say they were fooled. They were doing the fooling. Many will take the fall. The community should not let this pass.

I need to watch football now but you can mark my words.
Dispatches from the Culture Wars » Blog Archive » The ‘Science’ of Bigfoot, Done by Press Release

Matt Moneymaker is correct

There is nothing in the history of Bigfoot research to suggest it is human. The reason is that nothing human has ever been found. Not one researcher can point to anything found in the woods and say that was a result of human activity.

Early man formed society and culture. Even primitive man made fire and carved tools. They devised hunting skills and basic agricultural abilities. There is nothing to suggest anything like that is going on in the woods of North America.

Crude structures have ben found but they seem to lack any purpose. Perhaps they are territory markers but that is only a guess. Other then that, not much else has been found.

Matt Moneymaker is among the ape theoriest, and for good reason. Bigfoot seems to live on instinct alone.

Take an animal we KNOW exist - deer. You may catch a fleeting glimpse of one and then it is gone. Ever wonder where it goes? Where does it sleep or live? You will never find out. So it is with Bigfoot.

This DNA study does not fly in the face of science because there is no science of Bigfoot. This DNA study flies in the face of decades if Bigfoot research. Many good People have spent years in the woods to develop what we know today. New paradigms are nice. This, however, is bad science.

It can be criticized simply because the people involved are advocates of Bigfoot. They have worked the problem in reverse. Only seeking what will fit your conclusion which was presented up front is Ad-Hoc science. This study will be thrown out on its poor methodology alone.

Perhaps we need a new approach. Perhaps science is the wrong tool in understanding this cryptid. It may very well transend reason, and be something unfamiliar to our expectations.

Unfortunately, the Ketchum study will prove to be just an elaborate hoax. Many will have egg on their face.

Too cute - the youngest Bigfoot researcher

A new Bigfoot researcher - bigfoottracket46 on YouTube - gets his little daughter into the act. He says Bessie loves to do the Bigfoot call. Matt, cliff and Nobody have a new fan.
What big ol hairy guy could resist all this cuteness.

David Paulides claims DNA study close to being released

The DNA samples of the North American Sasquatch seem to have been collected in a scientific manor. They used trail cams to identify the Bigfoot first. Then, they collected the hair it left behind. Scott Carpenter explains this in his blog post and Youtube video. "Dave Paulides, Executive Director of North American Bigfoot Search (NABS), announced today that the Bigfoot DNA Study is "Very Very Close" to a release date. Dave has posted this announcement via his webstite, The Bigfoot Blog #181. I am proud to be apart of this ground breaking team. Through hard work and persistence we were able make this breakthrough were others had failed. We were able to collect multiple hair samples using innovative new methods. One of the still capture photographs below, taken from an infrared trail camera video captured at night, shows one of the probable hair donors."

Is Shawn trying to create intrigue?

I saw the replay of Finding Bigfoot early this morning of the Vermont episode. The thermal scene wad interesting because something could be seen and the team wad noticing it. Now, it seems the claim is they did not notice it. That is coming from the Bigfoot Evidence blog. It was clear on the show they were observing something. What is the confusion?

Bigfoot at a Bigfoot conference

Nick Redfern states that when he was a speaker at a Bigfoot conference in Oklahoma a large creature was seen on the property. Considering most Bigfoot events are at lodges in State parks, is this farfetched?

Lair of the Beasts: Creatures and a Conference - Mania.com